The gospel of financial independence has a simple mantra: buy one fund, hold forever, relax. JL Collins built a cult following around this concept, suggesting he’d dump $100 million into Vanguard without a second thought. For Swiss residents staring at their Steuererklärung (tax declaration) forms and trying to decode the BVG/LPP (Occupational Pension) statements, this sounds like financial nirvana. No more analysis paralysis, no more complex portfolios, just one ticker symbol and peace of mind.
But Switzerland doesn’t do simple. The same system that runs trains with atomic clock precision also layers complexity onto what should be straightforward investing. That “VT and chill” strategy? It comes with asterisks, caveats, and paperwork that would make a Steueramt (Tax Office) bureaucrat weep with joy.
The Core Dilemma: US-Domiciled ETFs vs. Swiss Reality
Collins’ original strategy centers on Vanguard’s Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) or Total World Stock ETF (VT). These US-domiciled funds offer unbeatable expense ratios and total market coverage. For a Swiss resident, buying VT through Interactive Brokers feels like accessing investing’s promised land, until you read the fine print about US estate taxes.
Here’s where the dream meets Swiss pragmatism. US-domiciled ETFs expose Swiss investors to potential US estate tax on holdings above $60,000 if you meet an unfortunate end. Your heirs could face a tax bill of up to 40% on your portfolio’s value above that threshold. Suddenly, that simple strategy looks like a tax trap waiting to spring.
The alternative, European UCITS ETFs, avoids the estate tax issue entirely. Funds like Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS (VWRL) or iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS offer similar global exposure but domiciled in Ireland or Luxembourg. The trade-off? Slightly higher expense ratios and less favorable tax treatment on US dividends.
DA-1: The Form That Breaks the “Set and Forget” Promise
The Reddit wisdom suggests VT investors must file a DA-1 form annually to reclaim 15% of withheld US dividend tax. This isn’t quite mandatory, you can skip it and lose the money, but that violates the spirit of optimizing returns.
The math works like this: VT holds roughly 63% US stocks with a dividend yield below 1.5%. Reclaiming 15% of those dividends might save you around 0.14% annually. For a CHF 100,000 portfolio, that’s CHF 140 per year. Hardly life-changing, but the principle matters. The DA-1 form itself isn’t complex, just attach your broker’s dividend report showing withheld taxes. Yet it introduces an annual task that Collins’ “do nothing” philosophy explicitly rejects.
Swiss brokers like Saxo Bank simplify this with fancy barcodes that import directly into tax software. Interactive Brokers provides the necessary reports too, but you’ll pay significantly lower trading fees. The choice becomes: pay more per trade for convenience, or save on fees and handle slightly more paperwork.
The UCITS Compromise: Good Enough for Swiss Simplicity?
Many Swiss investors pivot to a single UCITS ETF like WEBG (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS) or VWRL. These funds offer:
– No US estate tax risk
– Simpler tax reporting (no DA-1 needed)
– CHF-denominated trading options
– Distribution options that may simplify tax declarations
The performance difference between VT and a comparable UCITS fund? Maybe 0.1-0.2% annually after accounting for all costs and tax differences. Over decades, that compounds, but the psychological benefit of true simplicity might outweigh the minimal cost.
Your Steuererklärung requires declaring all holdings in the Wertschriftenverzeichnis (securities list) with their value as of December 31. Both US and UCITS ETFs need reporting, but UCITS funds eliminate the dividend reclaim dance. For many, that’s worth the tiny expense ratio premium.
The 3a Pillar Problem
Collins’ strategy assumes you can pour everything into your chosen ETF. Swiss mandatory pension system says otherwise. Your Säule 3a (Third Pillar) contributions, up to CHF 7,056 annually for employed individuals, must go into approved 3a products. These are limited and rarely offer pure global equity exposure at Vanguard-level costs.
The workaround: treat your 3a as a separate satellite portfolio. Use a low-cost 3a provider like Finpension or VIAC with high equity allocations (up to 99%), then implement the Collins strategy in your taxable brokerage account. This two-pronged approach respects Swiss regulations while approximating the simplicity you crave.
Tax Reporting: The Devil in the Details
Swiss tax law treats capital gains as tax-free for private investors, but the definition of “private” can blur. The ESTV (Federal Tax Administration) uses Safe Harbour criteria: hold positions for at least six months, keep turnover below five times your portfolio value, avoid excessive leverage, and don’t use derivatives for speculation. Violate these, and your “simple” strategy becomes a professional trading business with taxable gains.
Wealth tax adds another layer. You’ll pay Vermögenssteuer on your global assets, typically 0.1-0.5% annually depending on your canton. That CHF 500,000 portfolio costs you CHF 500-2,500 yearly, regardless of whether you use VT or VWRL. The tax is unavoidable, but proper planning, like maximizing 3a contributions to reduce taxable wealth, helps.
Practical Implementation: A Swiss-Adapted Simple Path
Here’s how to actually execute this:
-
Choose your broker: Interactive Brokers for lowest costs and broadest access, or a Swiss broker like Cornèrtrader for integrated tax reporting. The fee difference matters more than the DA-1 convenience.
-
Pick your ETF:
- VT for maximum cost efficiency if you accept the estate tax risk and DA-1 task
- VWRL for UCITS simplicity with minimal performance drag
-
WEBG for CHF trading and distribution simplicity
-
Set up automatic investing: Monthly purchases eliminate timing decisions. Interactive Brokers supports this, Swiss brokers vary.
-
Handle tax reporting: Keep annual dividend reports. File DA-1 if using US ETFs. Declare everything in your Wertschriftenverzeichnis with December 31 values converted to CHF using official rates.
-
Manage your 3a separately: Maximize contributions to reduce taxable income and wealth, using the most equity-heavy option available.
The Real Cost of Complexity
The research reveals a telling sentiment: many Swiss investors find the DA-1 process irritating but manageable. One commenter noted the investment results across similar all-world funds are “97% the same.” The paralysis from analyzing 10-15 nearly identical ETFs likely costs more in missed returns than the 0.14% tax optimization benefit.
The spicy truth? Collins’ simple path works in Switzerland, but the Swiss system forces you to choose your complexity. Either accept minimal annual paperwork for US ETFs, or pay slightly more for UCITS simplicity. Neither is wrong, the real mistake is letting analysis paralysis prevent you from investing at all.
Your future self won’t care whether you chose VT or VWRL. They’ll care that you started early, stayed consistent, and didn’t overthink yourself into inaction. The Swiss path to wealth isn’t quite as simple as Collins’, but it’s still far simpler than most make it out to be.
Actionable takeaway: Open an Interactive Brokers account today. Buy CHF 1,000 of VWRL. Set up a monthly purchase plan. Worry about optimizing the last 0.1% after you’ve built a six-figure portfolio. The best strategy is the one you’ll actually stick with through market crashes, tax law changes, and the inevitable moment when simplicity meets Swiss bureaucracy.
