“Das Eigenheim ist der größte finanzielle Fehler der Mittelschicht.” This sentence, plastered across German financial media, triggers a predictable firestorm whenever it appears. The logic seems bulletproof: dump your down payment into ETFs instead of a mortgage, invest the monthly savings difference, and retire with a portfolio worth hundreds of thousands more than a paid-off house. Simple. Rational. And completely disconnected from how actual humans make decisions in Germany’s peculiar housing market.
The theory works perfectly in spreadsheets. In the messy reality of German life, where tenant protection laws are ironclad but landlords can still make your life miserable, the calculation gets complicated fast.
The Spreadsheet Warriors vs. The Mortgage Holders
Financial influencers like Gerald Hörhan declare homeownership “ökonomischer Unsinn” (economic nonsense), while Gerd Kommer calls the buy-over-rent mantra a “hartnäckiger Mythos” (persistent myth) that calcified into unquestioned dogma. Their weapon of choice? Opportunitätskosten (opportunity costs).
Here’s their playbook: Take your Eigenkapital (down payment) of €100,000. Instead of sinking it into a €500,000 apartment in Frankfurt’s Nordend (Nordend district), you invest it in a 60/40 stock-bond portfolio. Your monthly housing outlay drops from €2,181 (mortgage + maintenance) to €1,000 rent, freeing up €1,181 to pump into your ETF-Sparplan (ETF savings plan). After 25 years, you’re €200,000 richer than the homeowner. The math doesn’t lie.
But the math also doesn’t account for your landlord’s son deciding he wants your apartment for himself, triggering an Eigenbedarfskündigung (owner’s need termination) that leaves you scrambling in a market where finding a new €1,000 flat requires the luck of a lottery winner.
The Survivorship Bias Nobody Talks About
Holger Graf, professor at Hochschule Nürtingen, points out a statistical dirty secret: studies showing homeowners’ wealth advantage suffer from classic Survivorship-Bias (survivorship bias). They only include buyers whose purchases succeeded. The families who lost their shirts on a money-pit renovation or got forced to sell during a divorce? Vanished from the data.
More importantly, the studies reveal homeowners aren’t wealthier because of their property, but because the Zwangssparen (forced savings) of a mortgage creates financial discipline. An Empirica study for LBS found homeowners aged 50-59 have five times the net worth of renters with identical incomes. But as Gerd Kommer argues, this advantage disappears if renters simply match that same discipline.
The catch? Hardly anyone does. While homeowners sacrifice vacations and delay car upgrades to pay their Kreditrate (mortgage payment), renters face the daily temptation to spend that €1,181 “savings” on lifestyle inflation. The spreadsheet assumes robotic discipline for 30 years. Reality looks more like a new kitchen here, a Bali trip there, and an emergency fund that never quite reaches six months of expenses.
The Hidden Subsidy Keeping the Dream Alive
Here’s what the rent-vs-buy calculators never ask: How much Eigenkapital (equity) came from your parents? In online discussions, buyers admit their “affordable” mortgage payments often rest on invisible foundations, six-figure parental gifts, zinslose Darlehen (interest-free loans) from family, or guarantees that let them borrow at better rates.
One commenter notes: “Alle, die in meinem Freundeskreis gekauft haben, haben einen signifikanten Anteil an Eigenkapital mit eingebracht, oft inkl. einer kleinen Finanzspritze von Eltern und Großeltern.” (Everyone in my circle who bought brought significant equity, often including a small injection from parents and grandparents.)
This family support is the silent variable that breaks the theoretical model. When comparing your €1,000 rent to your neighbor’s €1,200 mortgage, you’re not seeing the €150,000 parental down payment that made their rate possible. Without this finanzielle Unterstützung durch die Familie beim Immobilienkauf (financial support from family when buying property), the math collapses for most millennials.
The Flexibility Tax vs. The Roots Premium
The debate isn’t purely financial, it’s existential. Sixteen percent of European renters choose tenancy specifically for mobility, rising to 50% in Malta and 33% in Finland. In Germany, where job markets span from Berlin startups to Munich corporates, the ability to relocate without a 10% Kaufnebenkosten (transaction costs) penalty is valuable.
But this flexibility comes at an emotional cost. After two Eigenbedarfskündigungen (owner’s need terminations), one homeowner told researchers: “Ich würde jederzeit wieder ein Eigenheim kaufen. Ja die Rendite ist schlechter als mit ‘All in ETF’. Der Seelenfrieden ist es mir aber allemal ‘wert’.” (I’d buy again anytime. Sure, the return is worse than going all-in on ETFs. But the peace of mind is worth it.)
This Seelenfrieden, knowing your home is truly yours, that no landlord can raise rent 20% or decide to sell, carries a price tag that financial models can’t capture. It’s the premium for psychological security.
The German Exception
Germany’s 46% homeownership rate, lowest in the EU where the average is 70%, isn’t an accident. Historical factors like post-war rental construction, strong Mieterschutz (tenant protection), and cultural preference for renting created a different baseline. But this is changing.
The Kaufnebenkosten (transaction costs) alone, 10-12% for Grunderwerbsteuer (property transfer tax), Notar (notary), and Makler (agent), make buying a €400,000 home a €440,000 commitment before the first paint can opens. Add the 20-30% Eigenkapital requirement, and a typical buyer needs €80,000-120,000 cash just to start.
Marcel Fratzscher, president of DIW Berlin, calls the housing market a “Prüfstein für soziale Gerechtigkeit” (test case for social justice). His research shows children of homeowners have dramatically better chances of buying themselves, not because of income, but because family wealth provides the down payment. For those without this inheritance pathway, the spreadsheet’s theoretical advantage is moot. They can’t afford the entry fee to play the game.
When the Theory Meets Your 30s
The pure financial argument for renting + investing holds up, if you’re a high-earning, mobile professional who’ll actually invest the difference consistently. For the average German household earning €2,500 net, the reality is messier.
Consider the €124,000 gap facing middle-class buyers: A €296,000 affordable purchase price versus €420,000 actual cost for an average Baden-Württemberg family home. That chasm isn’t closed by skipping lattes. It’s closed by inherited wealth, dual incomes with job security, or accepting a 90-minute commute.
The controversial truth? Both sides are right, but they’re solving different problems. The ETF-Sparplan (ETF savings plan) strategy optimizes financial returns. Homeownership optimizes life stability and psychological security. The “mistake” isn’t choosing one over the other, it’s pretending they’re interchangeable goals.
The Verdict Is Personal
Before letting a calculator decide your future, Graf suggests asking: “Bin ich jemand, der an einem Ort bleiben möchte, möglichst für immer? Bin ich jemand, der viel verreisen, woanders leben, woanders arbeiten möchte?” (Do I want to stay in one place forever, or move for work and life?)
If you’re the permanent type with family support, buying can make sense, especially if you value forced savings over voluntary discipline. If you’re mobile, career-focused, and actually invests the difference, renting wins mathematically.
But if you’re the typical German millennial without family wealth? The debate is academic. You’re not choosing between a mortgage and an ETF portfolio. You’re choosing between renting and… still renting, because saving €120,000 while paying €1,000 monthly rent on a €2,500 income is a 14-year marathon that most can’t run.
The real financial error isn’t buying or renting. It’s believing the choice is purely financial in the first place.
Next Steps for Your Situation:
-
Calculate your true opportunity costs using the Finanztip-Rechner, but factor in your actual savings discipline, not idealized scenarios.
-
Audit your family support reality: Can parents provide 10-20% equity? This single variable often determines feasibility more than income.
-
Assess your psychological profile: Are you a forced-saver who needs mortgage pressure, or a disciplined investor who’ll actually execute the ETF plan?
-
Consider the Risiken von Überbewertung beim Immobilienkauf before buying in overheated markets.
-
Explore alternative Altersvorsorge durch ETF-basierte Strategien if you choose the rental path, just don’t assume you’ll automatically invest the difference.
The housing decision is less about optimizing wealth and more about aligning your financial strategy with your life goals, family resources, and psychological wiring. The math is just the opening bid in a much more personal negotiation.
